Kai wrote:Murray- look no further!
1)
You know by now that you should avoid expert opinions by anyone (me included) on the internet like the plague!
2)
This misconception of the R912 weight must be corrected. When you get in the coolant, the radiator, and the oil thank under the cowling, the installed weight of the motor is very close to the Jab 33A
3)
We have already done the tests, several years ago. The short and simple answer is that it depends on the scales you are using.
Put the airplane on high quality electronic load cells like the racing car society is using, and your results should be fairly accurate. Of course, there might be exeptions. I have never tried them, but I suspect that certified aircraft scales would also work just fine. However, if you use three identical bathroom scales, they take none to kindly to side loads- side loads that will occur because of horizontal gear leg and tyre deflection. Even worse, if you use one single scale that you move around with a combination of distance blocks to compensate for uneven loading, you will be surprised how much the slightest deviation influences the end result.
Bathroom scales are generally made for exact vertical loads, so you must ensure that the loads imposed on them by the tyres really are vertical. We solved it by tensioning up a thin steel wire between the axle stubs on the titanium rods, effectively preventing any horizontal movement on the scale platforms (jack up the plane, install the wire, tension it so much that nothing can deflect, and lower the plane back on the scale platforms). That way, we got results 3-6% lower than without the wire.
Kai wrote:Be it far from it that I´d be the one to mar this moment of rejoice and jubilation, but may I suggest that a reduction from 340 kg to 120 kg is slightly optimistic. May I suggest 320 kg?
Murray Parr wrote:I would never use anything other than high quality calibrated scales and the ones used the first weighing were certified aircraft scales.
BRS wrote:I was involved in the develepement of an STC years ago where we needed to 'calibrate' our scales. We purchased a 50# bag of play sand which we were going to use later as ballast. That be came our "known weight" since it was clearly labeled as 50#s. Seems that was acceptable to the FAA.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests