Weighing Aircraft (was Sonex High Wing!)

Use this area for aviation related general discussions, newsworthy items, and non model specific topics.

Weighing Aircraft (was Sonex High Wing!)

Postby Kai » Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:02 am

Murray- look no further!

We have already done the tests, several years ago. The short and simple answer is that it depends on the scales you are using.

Put the airplane on high quality electronic load cells like the racing car society is using, and your results should be fairly accurate. Of course, there might be exeptions. I have never tried them, but I suspect that certified aircraft scales would also work just fine. However, if you use three identical bathroom scales, they take none to kindly to side loads- side loads that will occur because of gear leg and tyre deflection. Even worse, if you use one single scale that you move around with a combination of distance blocks to compensate for uneven loading, you will be surprised how much the slightest deviation influences the end result.

Bathroom scales are generally made for exact vertical loads, so you must ensure that the loads imposed on them by the tyres really are vertical. We solved it by tensioning up a thin steel wire between the axle stubs on the titanium rods, effectively preventing any horizontal movement on the scale platforms (jack up the plane, install the wire, tension it so much that nothing can deflect, and lower the plane back on the scale platforms). That way, we got results 3-6% lower than without the wire.
Sonex A #0525- SG, DS.
EdgePerfomance EP915ECI, 123HP
Kai
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:36 am
Location: ICAO ENHS

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Kai » Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:11 am

Murray- look no further!

1)
You know by now that you should avoid expert opinions by anyone (me included) on the internet like the plague!

2)
This misconception of the R912 weight must be corrected. When you get in the coolant, the radiator, and the oil thank under the cowling, the installed weight of the motor is very close to the Jab 33A

3)
We have already done the tests, several years ago. The short and simple answer is that it depends on the scales you are using.

Put the airplane on high quality electronic load cells like the racing car society is using, and your results should be fairly accurate. Of course, there might be exeptions. I have never tried them, but I suspect that certified aircraft scales would also work just fine. However, if you use three identical bathroom scales, they take none to kindly to side loads- side loads that will occur because of horizontal gear leg and tyre deflection. Even worse, if you use one single scale that you move around with a combination of distance blocks to compensate for uneven loading, you will be surprised how much the slightest deviation influences the end result.

Bathroom scales are generally made for exact vertical loads, so you must ensure that the loads imposed on them by the tyres really are vertical. We solved it by tensioning up a thin steel wire between the axle stubs on the titanium rods, effectively preventing any horizontal movement on the scale platforms (jack up the plane, install the wire, tension it so much that nothing can deflect, and lower the plane back on the scale platforms). That way, we got results 3-6% lower than without the wire.
Last edited by Kai on Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Sonex A #0525- SG, DS.
EdgePerfomance EP915ECI, 123HP
Kai
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:36 am
Location: ICAO ENHS

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Skippydiesel » Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:16 am

Wow!

3-6% reduction that could take my obese, 340 kg Sonex , down to 320 Kg - exactly what the original builder estimated the empty weight to be.

Definitely get a reweigh with a wire to control suspension spread.
Last edited by Skippydiesel on Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Kai » Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:31 am

Be it far from it that I´d be the one to mar this moment of rejoice and jubilation, but may I suggest that a reduction from 340 kg to 120 kg is slightly optimistic. May I suggest 320 kg?
Sonex A #0525- SG, DS.
EdgePerfomance EP915ECI, 123HP
Kai
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:36 am
Location: ICAO ENHS

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Murray Parr » Tue Dec 19, 2023 5:51 pm

Kai wrote:Murray- look no further!

1)
You know by now that you should avoid expert opinions by anyone (me included) on the internet like the plague!

2)
This misconception of the R912 weight must be corrected. When you get in the coolant, the radiator, and the oil thank under the cowling, the installed weight of the motor is very close to the Jab 33A

3)
We have already done the tests, several years ago. The short and simple answer is that it depends on the scales you are using.

Put the airplane on high quality electronic load cells like the racing car society is using, and your results should be fairly accurate. Of course, there might be exeptions. I have never tried them, but I suspect that certified aircraft scales would also work just fine. However, if you use three identical bathroom scales, they take none to kindly to side loads- side loads that will occur because of horizontal gear leg and tyre deflection. Even worse, if you use one single scale that you move around with a combination of distance blocks to compensate for uneven loading, you will be surprised how much the slightest deviation influences the end result.

Bathroom scales are generally made for exact vertical loads, so you must ensure that the loads imposed on them by the tyres really are vertical. We solved it by tensioning up a thin steel wire between the axle stubs on the titanium rods, effectively preventing any horizontal movement on the scale platforms (jack up the plane, install the wire, tension it so much that nothing can deflect, and lower the plane back on the scale platforms). That way, we got results 3-6% lower than without the wire.


Thanks for all the advice from all that chimed in.

I would never use anything other than high quality calibrated scales and the ones used the first weighing were certified aircraft scales. I will weigh it again in the future and do all I can to remove the side load forces. Maybe there are a lot of planes out there with falsely high weights due to not being fussy with this. I will be surprised if mine doesn't lose some weight by weighing it more carefully as my current empty weight would still be a good 50 pounds heavier than standard even if I removed the few extras, I put in.

It will be interesting to see if a test can be worth a thousand expert opinions as Bryan pointed out...

On a side note, it seems this thread has become about weight and balance and not really specific to the high wing. Not sure if it would be possible to have the last few pages moved to a new title something like weight and balance.
Murray Parr
WXB0015
Rotax 912ULS
MGL Explorer Lite
First flight May 6/23
RV9 builder (Sold)
Murray Parr
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:50 pm

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Skippydiesel » Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:19 pm

Kai wrote:Be it far from it that I´d be the one to mar this moment of rejoice and jubilation, but may I suggest that a reduction from 340 kg to 120 kg is slightly optimistic. May I suggest 320 kg?


Thanks Kai - I can be a bit slack when it comes to proofreading - correction made.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Sonerai13 » Wed Dec 20, 2023 12:49 pm

Murray Parr wrote:I would never use anything other than high quality calibrated scales and the ones used the first weighing were certified aircraft scales.


Just so everyone understands, in the USA there are no such thing as "Certified Aircraft Scales". The FAA does not certify scales, or any other tools for that matter. They stipulate that tools be calibrated/maintained in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, but they do not certify anything.

It is always recommended that you check any scale you are going to use with a known, verified weight so as to establish accuracy at the time of use for aircraft purposes, and document this calibration check. Once you ascertain that the scales you are using are accurate, you can be assured that your aircraft weight is accurate enough to satisfy the FAA.
Joe Norris
Sonex N208GD (S/N 450)
Sonerai II N13NN (S/N 1206)
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
User avatar
Sonerai13
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby BRS » Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:49 pm

I was involved in the develepement of an STC years ago where we needed to 'calibrate' our scales. We purchased a 50# bag of play sand which we were going to use later as ballast. That be came our "known weight" since it was clearly labeled as 50#s. Seems that was acceptable to the FAA.
-Brock
Sonex-A (s/n 1013)
R2300, P-tip 54/50
Center Stick
V16, TT22
User avatar
BRS
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:50 pm

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Sonerai13 » Wed Dec 20, 2023 4:08 pm

BRS wrote:I was involved in the develepement of an STC years ago where we needed to 'calibrate' our scales. We purchased a 50# bag of play sand which we were going to use later as ballast. That be came our "known weight" since it was clearly labeled as 50#s. Seems that was acceptable to the FAA.


Yep, especially if all three scales agree that it is indeed 50 lbs.
Joe Norris
Sonex N208GD (S/N 450)
Sonerai II N13NN (S/N 1206)
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
User avatar
Sonerai13
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Re: Sonex High Wing!

Postby Kai » Thu Dec 21, 2023 11:44 am

Agreed,

Calibration does not have to be more complicated than that.

But 50 lbs seems on the low side: would´nt 300 lbs preferable? Some scales show errors that vary with load, and the majority of planes seem to weigh in at 600-700 lbs EW. IMHO this should eliminate some erroneous readings.

If working with two bathroom scales, look around you, and select the heaviest looking person. Order him up on your two scales. They should both show the same weight: if not, adjust them. Chances are your live calibration weight will protest that the scales are off. Never mind- he is obviously lying out of the back of his teeth: two identical scales can´t be that far off!
Last edited by Kai on Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sonex A #0525- SG, DS.
EdgePerfomance EP915ECI, 123HP
Kai
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 1:36 am
Location: ICAO ENHS

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests