BK9977 wrote:There was one accident of a Waiex that had a structural seperation of the tail. The exact cause of that breakup isn't clear
Actually the NTSB found that the Waiex was designed with improper engineering for y/v tail aircraft. Sonex immediately issued a fix before there was any preliminary cause.
From the NTSB report (mentions nothing in the report of poor build quality)
"It is likely that the pilot, distracted by the loss of engine power, allowed the airplane to enter an unusual attitude, and the tail separated during the pilot’s attempted recovery from the unusual attitude."
"The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be:
The in-flight failure of the aircraft’s Y-tail attachment structure during maneuvering flight due to overload. Contributing to the accident was, the kit manufacturer’s use of 14 CFR Part 23, Appendix A design guidelines intended for a conventional tail airplane without a V- (or Y-) tail."
One other thing I have heard multiple Waiex pilots complain about is that while in the air they handle similar to the Sonex, on the ground they are rather limited in crosswinds because lack of rudder authority. I have heard Waiex pilots say anything over 7mph starts getting a little wild. I know some have told me they have to line up on one edge of the runway because they will be pushed over to the other side before yaw becomes effective. Some have gone in the grass off the side of the runway because of this.
As for acro, I am still not convinced the Y-tail is up to par with a conventional tail. I have time in both and while they do behave similarly they are not the same. I have done some minor acro in a Waiex but don't see it as a competitor in sportsman class acro where the Sonex can be. One other thing on the acro, with the aerocarb/aeroinjector, it does not regulate flow. So in a routine your mixture will be all over the place, way lean over the top of a loop, to way rich coming out of the bottom. A buddy of mine who flys advanced/unlimited comp put a Sonex through the sportsman routine and said the airframe is fine, but the carb was nowhere near what he considered acceptable since he had the motor stall out twice during low g maneuvers due to fuel starvation form the lack of flow regulation.
Just a couple of thoughts for you to consider.
daleandee wrote:Of course the factory's line is "they fly EXACTLY the same" which is an impossibility because the design is not the same.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests