by Bryan Cotton » Tue Feb 14, 2023 11:43 pm
Compared to a NA Aerovee, the turbo costs some weight. IIRC, something like 20-25 lbs so you don't gain the entire 50 lbs.
I really had two goals in mind when I went with a straight Aerovee:
1) Economics. Cheap to buy/build, cheap to operate, cheap to maintain. 57 hours in and I love the Aerovee. It has met my goals here.
2) Lower performance - My kids will have the opportunity to learn to fly in the airplane. I'm a firm believer that a low performance airplane, i.e. one you have to fly well at gross weight and know your performance, is good for training. If you learn to fly in a Super Cub then no runway will ever seem too short, no obstacle too high, and you don't even really have to be that good. It has also met my goals here as well. When we are heavy you have to fly the airplane well and be aware of your performance limitations.
With this said, we are still climbing around 400 fpm when heavy. Much better than towing a heavy two place glider with a super cub. Not all that different than a heavy C140.
My chute comes Friday. I plan to fly acro from the right seat so I can do left hand throttle, right hand stick. I'll probably do acro from both sides as I fly from both sides anyway.
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23