Skippydiesel wrote:Hi Murray,
Cant help with the prop question you posed however advise - if not already done, double check the engine/prop RPM read out before going any further. Its not unusual for instrument error to be the real issue.
Murray Parr wrote:That thought has crossed my mind but I don't have any means to check it against.
GraemeSmith wrote:Murray Parr wrote:That thought has crossed my mind but I don't have any means to check it against.
Digital Laser tach. Point it at the prop blades. It counts them.
https://www.amazon.com/AGPtek%C2%AE-Pro ... 221&sr=8-3
Hall Effect / Tach. Should be reliable but poor/intermittent grounding or borderline sensitivity in the EFIS can give false readings.
Brett wrote:WC64QR-81G is the prop I'm running atm. Definitely over propped. I sent all the data to Sensenich early in the piece along with flight data of the aerovee turbo prob for comparison. I never heard back from Sensenich but few weeks later saw the recommendation for the Rotax props changed on their website.
I get fantastic cruise speeds but climb is not so great.
Murray Parr wrote:Rotax recommends to aim for 5200 rpm static, I'm still 300 shy of that. Not sure if the engine is weak or if it is over propped or a combination of both.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests