by Skippydiesel » Sun Sep 04, 2022 9:23 pm
Bryan, I am a dedicated convert from GA to Recreational Aircraft Association Australia (RAAus). Did some flying in a Citabria recently - felt like flying a tank.
My personal view of RAA class aircraft is that the KISS principal should be, wherever practical adhered to. Some RAA pilots seem to try and get their aircrafts level of system redundancy up to or better than GA - I don't understand this (unless its a bragging issue). BUT where a cost effective nil impact on performance safety enhancement can be implemented, I tend to go for it.
My new Sonex has come to me with a level of systems sophistication I never aspired to - not suggesting for a moment that I will undo the "package" I have purchased.
I have researched installing an A of A compatible with my Dynon - seems to be a simple cost effective enhancement that would improve my aircraft safety, particularly when attempting a landing on marginal field. Unfortunately the systems I have looked at would require significant changes to my pitot mounting - so something that may happen in the future.
The installation of a small analogue ASI, cost not too different from the A of A mast, will, in the event of a Dynon failure, give me all the information that I might need to get me down & stopped all in one piece. In the short term I think this will be the way I will go.
As for finding oneself landing down wind - most of my flying is over heavily treed, undulating to precipitous, terrain with only the occasional small field. An engine out would see me looking for the open space that I felt I could put down in with the greatest chance of my survival and secondly least damage to the aircraft - this could quite easily involve a down wind landing . When I fly out west the country opens up into larger flatter terrain, infinitely more options for a successful "out landing" I could even be picky about which 1000 acre field I might like to put down on.