by 13brv3 » Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:49 pm
I try to follow AC43 when possible, which is why I asked. The rod end bolts are NOT subject to rotation, so it looks to me that a castle nut isn't required.
AC43 allows the use of drilled bolts and castle nut in any situation, BUT they must be torqued to the same specs as self locking nuts. That means doing a dance with shims and washers to be able to line up the cotter pin in the allowed min-max torque range. If that's what's being done on these rod ends, then there's certainly nothing wrong with it, though I don't see anything better about it either. I have full faith in friction nuts, and there are a whole lot of RVs flying with friction nuts on the rod ends.
There's a somewhat unwritten (as far as I can tell) rule about castle nuts. There are situations where rotation has to occur, and in those you wouldn't torque the bolt to the normal range. For situations like that, I've always just used washers to make the cotter pin hole line up at what felt like the proper rotational force.
The problem that I'd bet exists is that people will not have these rod end bearing bolts tight, so the bolts will eventually wobble and wear out the holes. I know when I took this apart today, I could unscrew every castle nut by hand, which I believe is unacceptable.
Rusty
Rusty
Onex- Rotax 912 (160 hours and counting)
Fixed wing, gyroplane, A&P