One point: The standard canopy and windscreen uses a Lexan (flat-wrapped) windscreen and an acrylic canopy. The Todd's canopy and windscreen is all acrylic. Because it is "blown" all at once and then cut, the Todd's canopy generally has a nice, continuous "line" when viewed in profile. This is hard (but not impossible) to achieve using the standard construction method.
There's a significant difference in impact tolerance between acrylic and Lexan (polycarbonate). They are both clear and they both look about the same, but they behave very differently when hit. If a bird should ever become very big in your windscreen, this could be important.
-- This thread on the Homebuilt Airplane board gives a great description of how one RV-8 builder modified the "stock" blown acrylic windscreen with a flat-wrapped polycarbonate windscreen.
(Subsequent edit: Charlie Radford correctly points out that the RV-8 builder used plexiglas, not Lexan for his new windshield. True, I missed that.) http://www.homebuiltairplanes.com/forums/aircraft-design-aerodynamics-new-technology/11740-rv-8-windshield-mod-2.html. He did this after several birds entered his cockpit and nearly blinded him after coming through the acrylic windscreen. Three quail at about 165 knots--in fairness, that's a lot faster than most of us go. Good photos at the above link of the hole left by the birds.
There are some fairly well-done videos on the web comparing the impact resistance of acrylic to Lexan. Lexan "gives" a lot more, whereas at the same stress levels acrylic will crack/fracture. Here's a video of acrylic and Lexan motorcyle windscreens being subjected to some impacts. It's not scientific, but it is an attention-getter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HlEfJFDWXpMMany people really like their Todd's canopies and have been flying with them successfully for years. I'm satisfied with my "stock" windscreen and canopy.