by n502pd » Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:51 pm
That was probably very exciting! After years of flying and assisting in annuals on my 172, I learned that the nut holding the two washers may not need to be dead tight, in otherwords, tight enough to cause the inner diameter of the two washers to act like cutting surfaces. The cable used was indeed the solid type, and I never saw any cessna I assisted on with a flex cable. With this in mind, I purchashed a cessna style push-pull control for my throttle, and upsized the diameter of the inner cable/wire to as large as was available. I am pleased with the functionality, even tho I had to install a motion reversing arm on the firewall. In my opinion, this is one of those areas where over engineering...so to speak...should be considered. The retaining bolt and nut, with the oversized wire, still should not be overtightened., but for sure tightened enough so as to not slip with rough motion reversals. And, remember to turn the last 1/4-1/2 inch of the free end to a 90 deg or so angle to prevent the cable coming completely out of the retaining nut if it should lossen, even with a stop nut applied. This should be one of the prime inspection points when doing a condition inspection too! All above is, of course , IMHO!!! :D
Joe Nelsen
scratch built :D
Sirpeedee, N502PD, s/n 1510, Aero Vee 2.1 s/n 0870,
ADS-B in (Stratux)/out(SkyBeacon)
Flying @81.7
KGYI/N. Tx Reg/Perrin Field
EAA Technical Counselor, Chapter 323, Sherman, TX