Mike, I think that would be a hit. Keep a relatively stock Sonex fuselage, but use a longer wing. My choice would be to add 24" "stub" wings on each side of the fuselage and with a fold fitting right there (pull out the outer panel, twist LE up or down, swing back along the fuselage--like a Thorpe/Sunderland S-18 folds). The "stub" wing could hold an aux fuel tank and/or a baggage locker. To reduce production costs, outboard of the "stub" wing could be a fairly standard Sonex wing, use the same ribs and skins. Or, if a more efficient cruiser is desired, go with a new wing of longer span, narrower chord.MichaelFarley56 wrote:I can't help but wonder if people would be interested in taking a Sonex/Waiex B model fuselage and replacing the stock wings with longer, non-aerobatic wings. This would sacrifice the acro capability but possibly make for a more efficient, easier to fly (if that's even possible!) LSA. Sort of like when Vans took the RV-6 and created the RV-9.
Sonex1517 wrote:and I think I hear Jessica snickering
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 91 guests