by andrewp » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:42 pm
Hi Folks,
Good ol Sonex 618 has been running nicely, but over the last 18 months, we have been running over to the dark side and fixing up an elderly Cessna 182 from 1962 and living that adventure. The are good boring airplanes, but boy I surely wish Sonex made a 4 place airplane that we could take the kids everywhere in. Operating a certified airplane is a massive pain in the ass/arse.
Actually let me get off my topic for a moment:
We have two growing children and we like to go places as a family. Aviation shouldn't be a separating activity, it should be inclusive. We have been into the SFRA in DC, down to the coast, up to Hershey PA and of course locally for BBQ. Aviation takes on a whole other dimension when you can do it with everyone and it changes what you fly to and what you do when you get there.
At the risk of John Monnett personally coming down to NC and punching me in the face (I would deserve it, not just for this), if Sonex were to (say) come up with a trigear four place with a nice V tail that hung a UL Power engine with 160-200hp and awesome FADEC on the front, I would dump the 182 in a big ditch and go build that. It doesn't have to do what a 182 does, but I can tell you, I would do it. I LOVE my Sonex dearly and giggle like a school girl when I fly it (particularly after flying the 182) and just wish it fitted the kids so I didn't have to lower myself to be seen in a Cessna. It is fun to yank and bank, but it is sure fun to go places and see stuff as well, and it is nowhere near as much fun by yourself. Now this is a bit of a departure from the normal Sonex mission and all that, but I don't care. I don't want to build an RV, I like Sonex. I don't have 200K to spend on an RV-10. So, if you are like me and probably mentally ill, feel free to send me a message and we can form a committee and then make a working group and then maybe write up some minutes, because a 4 place is not really a "sport aircraft". Regardless, I am very passionate on this topic. I tell you who is more, is the lady who lets me live at her place. Like all pilots, it is all about ME ME ME. I mean us. Ok, got that off my chest. Moving along.
Ok, onto the actual topic:
The 182 has a lowish compression o-470 engine. We have been running non-ethanol mogas in it and apart from the issue getting it into the airplane, it has been delightful. For the type of trips we do, it means a lot of the time we can run off mogas. Hell it can run off normal unleaded stuff and be happy, although we use the higher octane stuff. The auto fuel STC sticker of course makes the engine work.
The Sonex I have been loathe to try anything that isn't 100LL. I had to wrap my gascolator and wrap the exhaust a lot to stop fuel vaporization on 100LL. I know one gentleman who did some nice stuff with shielding and directing flow who ran mogas with a 3300, but I am pretty sure if I ran it in my current configuration, there would be a lot of burbling. I finally just paid attention to the burp tube thing and I understand what folk are on about there... now.
Anyway, I am interested in folk to do run off mogas in the Jab 3300 (premium ul of course) and/or aerovee, what steps they took to prevent vaporization and the general experience. If folk are running with that evil ethanol in there too, love to hear how badly that is going. I have to have something to do with the next decade after the 182 is finally fixed up and I am waiting for the end of time for Sonex to bring out a four place airplane (NOT).
John, you don't even have to call me. I will just tell go look at myself in the hall of mirrors and tell myself off. Doesn't stop me from wishing.
Cheers,
Andrew
Sonex #618 N618PE
Cessna 182E 1962 N3070Y