by ViennaVA223 » Sat May 14, 2016 3:22 pm
NO!!! The long feature article about emergency parachutes for sport pilots in the latest issue of Kitplanes was NOT good--it was LAME!!!
I am at home, recovering from surgery (elective, so I oughtn't bitch too much), grinding through the days of pain, swelling, and fatigue. I'm probably a bit tetchy right now as a result. However, I must say I was very disappointed by the quality of the Kitplanes article. I consider Kitplanes to be a superlative publication, but this article fell quite short of their normally high standards.
FWIW, I do not now nor have I ever worked for or represented any parachute manufacturer anywhere on the planet. And I only made 200 jumps during my misspent youth. However, I've been wearing emergency parachutes in various aircraft since the early `70s and have long been a keen student of the subject.
The Kitplanes article was a nice, soft (Softie?) advertorial for Para-Phernalia and the Softie line. Period. Not a single other manufacturer was mentioned. The ram-air canopy option was not mentioned.
SO MUCH MORE can be said, and SHOULD be said, about the subject of emergency parachutes for sport pilots. I will try to come back to this later; right now I have to ice myself.
Jan W. Steenblik/ViennaVA223
CML ASEL/ASES, IFR Airplane, PPL Glider
USPA B-4416
Future Sonex builder: Sonex, tailwheel, perhaps Rotax 915