Turbo flying

Use this area for aviation related general discussions, newsworthy items, and non model specific topics.

Re: Turbo flying

Postby gammaxy » Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:27 pm

SonexN369UR wrote:Tried to drain oil from crankcase w new filter system in place. NO LUCK no oil drain when I opened nut on the bottom.


Sounds like you are describing the same problem I had the first time I changed the oil after installing the mini sump. I was quite surprised/panicked when I removed the plug and oil didn't immediately come pouring out :-) You should be able to disconnect the oil line to the sump to drain the oil. The mushroom-shaped rubber seal is too thick or the wrong shape for the filter and forces the check valve to press against the bottom of the mini sump so oil can't drain to the plug. After discovering the problem I modified mine so there is a bit of clearance from the drain plug. This thread has more information:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2567

I don't have the turbo so I have no advice about the high oil pressure.
Chris Madsen
Aerovee Sonex N256CM
Flying since September 2014
Build log: http://chrismadsen.org
gammaxy
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:31 am

Re: Turbo flying

Postby Waiex 176 » Wed Apr 06, 2016 1:13 pm

I have over 35 hours on my turbo. I see 85 psi oil pressure on start up, and 65 - 75 psi in flight after the oil gets warm. Oil temp 175 on a hot day. As far as draining the oil. I use the return line on the side of the sump. Oil will only trickle out the drain plug. Sounds to me like your system is operating as expected.

John
Waiex 176
Waiex 176
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 1:53 pm

Re: Turbo flying

Postby SonexN369UR » Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:42 pm

Guys when I try to use the drain bolt on my new turbo install I GET NO OIL... had to use the return line from my oil/air seperator...What gives???How does the mini sump work if I he drain plug and get no oil??/

Thanks for all the help so far TURBO 4 minitues, 40 seconds....

JACK
N369UR
SonexN369UR
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Fly out of Zephyrhills Florida.

Re: Turbo flying

Postby SonexN369UR » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:32 am

Hello Everyone:
Does anyone know if I have to notify FAA FSDO that I now have a Turbo powered Sonex? Will I have to re-enter Phase I testing?
Thank you
Jack
N369UR
813-610-7184
SonexN369UR
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Fly out of Zephyrhills Florida.

Re: Turbo flying

Postby MichaelFarley56 » Thu Feb 02, 2017 1:16 pm

Jack,

By all accounts, adding the turbo should be considered a major alteration and would require a notification to the local FSDO for re-entry into Phase 1. Before you call them though, read your Operating Limitations. The only thing the FSDO technically needs to do is approve the testing area for your Phase 1 testing.

You'll most likely need at least a 5 hour Phase 1. Good luck!
Mike Farley
Waiex #0056 - N569KM (sold)
Onex #245
MichaelFarley56
 
Posts: 1485
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:38 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Turbo flying

Postby wlarson861 » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:15 am

Not only is the turbo a major change but the big thing my FSDO was hung up on was the prop change. They told me that alone would trigger a return to phase 1. They said to send them a letter (snail mail) with the changes and proposed test area and testing time. I requested 35 miles centered on my home airport and 5 hours in phase 1 which they approved. Took about a week to get the approval letter back.
Bill Larson
N861SX
Sonex, polished, tail wheel, Generation 4 Jabiru 3300
wlarson861
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Turbo flying

Postby builderflyer » Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:51 am

Jack, the previous responders have it right (at least if your operating limitations (OL) read the same as mine) that your turbo and prop change will require a reentry into Phase I for additional testing.

But my question for those who may know is........if Jack already has an "approved test area", is there any real requirement to notify the FAA at this time since the OL only require an approval of the test area planned to be used and Jack may already have that from his earlier Phase I testing? In my case, I had moved and therefore had no "approved test area" at my new location when it came time to test some new props........so contacting the FSDO was necessary for that approval.

For sure, Joe Norris would have the answer to this expanded question and maybe he will chime in if he is still monitoring this list.

Art,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Sonex taildragger #95,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Jab3300#261
builderflyer
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:13 pm

Turbo flying

Postby Sonerai13 » Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:42 pm

Yep, changing the prop to a different make or model is a major change all by itself. Also, the horsepower upgrade by itself would be a major change as well. So the two together is a major-major change!!

As for the test area, technically once the airplane is signed out of phase one that test area approval is done with. Even if you're still in the same place, you should follow your operating limitations and get the area approved again. Such are the ways of the FAA!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Joe Norris
Sonex N208GD (S/N 450)
Sonerai II N13NN (S/N 1206)
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
User avatar
Sonerai13
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Re: Turbo flying

Postby wlarson861 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:43 am

I followed the instructions of the local FSDO which was to send a letter listing the modifications made and request a return to phase one for X # of hours (I said 5) and define my proposed test area. My original test area was 25 n miles. This time I asked for 35 which added another emergency airport and it was granted.
Bill Larson
N861SX
Sonex, polished, tail wheel, Generation 4 Jabiru 3300
wlarson861
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Turbo flying

Postby jjbardell » Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:47 pm

I wouldn't be shy asking for as big of a test area as you wish. My original was 40nm. After talking with my FSDO, I probably could have gotten 50+. Since you're already flying, I'd recommend making it big enough for some good airports for emergencies as Bill said in his post.
Building: [11323] Zenith 750 CruzerDuty27.5 / O-320 [Instagram Build Log: Zenith750CruzerSTOL]
N67LJ - Vans RV-9A #90504 (SOLD)
N83LJ - Sonex #0864 (SOLD)
https://rvpilotlife.wordpress.com/blog/home/
User avatar
jjbardell
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 5:12 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests