SonexEZ wrote:Someone mentioned the corvair but i have been in touch with Dan from SPA he says i will lose too much in gross weight , due to it being a trigear , so i have been looking for the 3300 , i also being old school cant stand the EIS system , going to rip that sucker out and put some gages in, will be selling the low time aerovee with mount and prop , cheep! I may just use it for a boat anchor for my boat
andrewp wrote:I think Tony Lewis and Jeff Schultz both moved from Aerovees to Jabs. You can see http://www.sonex604.com/ for some more details. Jeff is on his second Sonex now and a wonderful machine it looks like.
I have a Jab so I can't comment on the cross over, but it is a whole different ball of wax. Changing engines is a good amount of work no matter what you do. You will never be burning the low GPH of an aerovee and it will cost a whole lot more to live with, but it will put a smile on your face regardless. Aerovee is better at some things (low expense, personal satisfaction), Jab is better at other (turning a lot more money into a lot more noise). Nothing is perfect!
AP
jerryhain wrote:One thing you might want to know is the Turbo aerovee outperforms the jab at high altitudes. 8K +
Compared to changing to a jab it's a low-cost easy conversion for almost the same performance at low altitude and much better performance at high altitudes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests