Wheel Camber

Discussion for builders, pilots, owners, and those interested in building or owning a Sonex.

Wheel Camber

Postby Corby202 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 8:22 pm

Does anyone know why there has been so much wheel camber designed into the Sonex undercarriage?? If the legs were longer and could bend more like a RV4 I could understand it. The only thing I can see happening is I will be scrubbing tyres out real quick. A friend asked me this question but I could say "this is what the plans show". What am I missing.
Thanks
Phil
Phil Bird
Sonex 759 JAB 2.2 Tailwheel
Mittagong NSW Australia
http://www.mykitlog.com/corby202/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78427482@ ... otostream/
Corby202
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:08 am

Re: Wheel Camber

Postby sonex892 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:53 pm

Phil

I dunno the idea behind so much camber but it appears to work.

I also don't know how many cycles a tire should be expected to last? The original Cheng Shin tires in the photo have over 400 landings on them. 99% of those on ashphelt. Turned around they are probably good for another 150 or 200 landings? I only replaced them to go to a larger tire. It may or may not have any affect on tire wear but I never take off in the 3 point attitude, I always raise the tail.

Image
sonex892
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:49 am
Location: Port Macquarie Australia

Re: Wheel Camber

Postby Corby202 » Sat Jun 20, 2015 12:36 am

Wow, thanks Steve. I would have put money against that being the case, what do I know.
I had put the good tyre wear on my Corby Starlet down to the fact I have no toe in/out and no built in camber.
Phil Bird
Sonex 759 JAB 2.2 Tailwheel
Mittagong NSW Australia
http://www.mykitlog.com/corby202/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78427482@ ... otostream/
Corby202
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:08 am

Re: Wheel Camber

Postby DCASonex » Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:18 am

Corby202 wrote:Does anyone know why there has been so much wheel camber designed into the Sonex undercarriage?? If the legs were longer and could bend more like a RV4 I could understand it. The only thing I can see happening is I will be scrubbing tyres out real quick. A friend asked me this question but I could say "this is what the plans show". What am I missing.
Thanks
Phil


If talking about a tail-dragger with its longer legs than a tri-gear, those stout looking titanium bars bend a lot more than you might think, and that camber goes away with load. My gear geometry is per the plans and works great. would not change anything.

David A.
DCASonex
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: Western NY USA

Re: Wheel Camber

Postby n982sx » Sat Jun 20, 2015 10:54 am

The camber works even though it looks extreme. The titanium bends nicely, even on my shorter legged tri-gear.

I too have over 400 landings on my tires with no scrubbing or uneven wear. My tires don't look quite as good as the photo above but they will get me through this season of flying.
Bob Meyers

Built and Flying Sonex N982SX http://n982sx.com
Built and Flying RV-14 N626KM http://n626km.com
User avatar
n982sx
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 11:45 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Wheel Camber

Postby Klimek » Sat Jun 20, 2015 1:38 pm

By looking at the wear, could be the "toe adjustment" I would check that
And adjust if needed. I have a ONEX and there is none for that plane. I don't
Know about the Sonex plans, though. In the auto industry, as camber changes so does the toe angle.
Camber has proven to cause less wear than toe. A tire can be "0" toe and wear slowly. A tire out of proper toe will cause the scrub effect and wear tires significantly.
I'd check the toe first.
Just butting in.
Frank
ONEX 090
Klimek
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 6:26 am
Location: Springdale, Ar....Northwest corner of the state


Return to Sonex

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests