I agree the VDO sender is not very reliable. Directly mounted to the engine, I'd go as far as saying it's basically junk. Maybe it's better remote mounted?
Several years ago, I decided to do a bunch of research and replace it with the same Kavlico sender Dynon and Garmin recommend. It was a little pricy, but I was willing to pay extra (compared to Falcon) because the big names seemed to like it. It was super satisfying until both Garmin and Dynon soon announced recommendations to switch to a different sender due to reports of leaks.
https://dynonavionics.com/bulletins/sup ... 50620E.phpFor only ~$150, I can now upgrade to a state-of-the-art solid state sender that is unlikely to leak.
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Se ... bpEA%3D%3DI admit, I'm still flying the old Kavlico and there seems to be claims that the likelihood of a leak was pretty small. I can't currently find any examples of catastrophic oil leaks despite having a memory of seeing something to that effect when the issue was first announced (thought it was a sender directly mounted to a Rotax engine). I do plan on upgrading, but my plan is to remotely mount the new sender at the same time and I haven't completely thought through the plumbing including filling in the fitting with a pinhole to mitigate any leaks.
I suspect the Falcon and old Kavlico sender are very similar. If I remember correctly, my MGL Enigma didn't allow me to input the correct calibration table, so it reads a bit low, but otherwise it is very satisfying compared the the randomness of the VDO.