Verifying the AeroVee Secondary Ignition Timing
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 11:53 am
One of the tasks an AeroVee engine builder must accomplish it to set the secondary (electronic) ignition timing to match the primary (magnatron) ignition timing. The magnatrons are fixed timing as a result of their mounting positions relative to the flywheel magnet, and this timing has already been determined by the factory as the optimal timing for the engine. The design of the secondary ignition, however, is completely adjustable.
The AeroVee assembly manual explains how the builder adjusts the secondary ignition to match the primary (http://www.aeroconversions.com/support/ ... Manual.pdf pg 45), but this method has a bit of uncertainty to it, even if performed with care. Bottom line, it's hard to set the trigger cap accurately by eye to within a degree or two. You do the best you can when you build the engine, then fine tune the timing once in flight. The procedure to fine tune in-flight is explained on page 46.
The in-flight procedure is straightforward, but has a few caveats. First, you need the engine and plane running well enough to do this test, and smooth air, otherwise the flight will be too "busy" to let things settle down and get good data. Second, make sure the carb is tuned well, or the changes in CHT and EGT won't be as apparent. Lastly, ensure that both ignitions are functioning properly and either one can be turned off in flight - sort out any wiring problems or rough running on one ignition first.
The test procedure is to fly the airplane in cruise at a consistent power setting and both ignitions on for a few minutes to let the RPM and temperatures stabilize. Don't do this immediately after climbing to altitude as the engine will be hot (or at least hotter) after the climb, and you want it stabilized first. Once the temps have stabilized note the RPM, CHT and EGT - this is your baseline. I like to snap a picture of the temps with my phone to simplify the note-taking.
After recording the baseline, turn off the secondary ignition; don't change anything else (throttle, airspeed, mixture, etc). If the engine runs rough at this point, you're not ready for this test anyway. Fly the plane for another few minutes (my experience shows 1-3 minutes is sufficient). Once the temps stabilize again, record the RPM, CHT and EGT once again.
With this data you should see one of 3 scenarios:
1) No (significant) change to RPM, CHT or EGT. You may see a minor reduction in RPM and/or a rise in EGT, but it should be minor (10-20 rpm, 20-50 deg EGT). This is due to the less-effcient burning of the mixture while operating on one set of plugs. The conclusion here is that the CHT didn't increase, so the timing of the secondary matches the timing of the primary. - Good-to-Go.
2) A notable reduction in CHT is observed, followed by a small loss of RPM and a decrease in EGT. If CHT goes DOWN with the secondary off, that's a sure-bet that the secondary timing is too advanced. The secondary is firing first and the engine is making more power as a result of the advanced timing situation. With more power comes more RPM, more heat (increased CHT) and more efficiency (lowered EGT). Advanced timing is a pretty good deal for power and efficiency, but it's dangerous because it places more stress on the engine and increases the chance of detonation at high-throttle (such as on takeoff on a hot day). There's a practical limit to timing advance, and the factory has found the "sweet-spot" over the years. Conclusion, retard the secondary timing slightly (1-2 degrees, if you can manage that fine of an adjustment), and test again.
3) The 3rd scenario is that the secondary timing is actually retarded, but you can't see that unless you re-fly the test and this time do a third piece where you get the baseline, then the secondary-off data, then the primary-off data. If the secondary is retarded you'll notice that the engine is making less power with the overall retarded timing, and the RPM will drop, CHT will drop, and EGT will increase.
The in-flight test is easy to perform, and can give you all the data you need to fine-tune the ignition timing top optimal performance. Give it a try and see for yourself how your engine behaves.
Jeff
The AeroVee assembly manual explains how the builder adjusts the secondary ignition to match the primary (http://www.aeroconversions.com/support/ ... Manual.pdf pg 45), but this method has a bit of uncertainty to it, even if performed with care. Bottom line, it's hard to set the trigger cap accurately by eye to within a degree or two. You do the best you can when you build the engine, then fine tune the timing once in flight. The procedure to fine tune in-flight is explained on page 46.
The in-flight procedure is straightforward, but has a few caveats. First, you need the engine and plane running well enough to do this test, and smooth air, otherwise the flight will be too "busy" to let things settle down and get good data. Second, make sure the carb is tuned well, or the changes in CHT and EGT won't be as apparent. Lastly, ensure that both ignitions are functioning properly and either one can be turned off in flight - sort out any wiring problems or rough running on one ignition first.
The test procedure is to fly the airplane in cruise at a consistent power setting and both ignitions on for a few minutes to let the RPM and temperatures stabilize. Don't do this immediately after climbing to altitude as the engine will be hot (or at least hotter) after the climb, and you want it stabilized first. Once the temps have stabilized note the RPM, CHT and EGT - this is your baseline. I like to snap a picture of the temps with my phone to simplify the note-taking.
After recording the baseline, turn off the secondary ignition; don't change anything else (throttle, airspeed, mixture, etc). If the engine runs rough at this point, you're not ready for this test anyway. Fly the plane for another few minutes (my experience shows 1-3 minutes is sufficient). Once the temps stabilize again, record the RPM, CHT and EGT once again.
With this data you should see one of 3 scenarios:
1) No (significant) change to RPM, CHT or EGT. You may see a minor reduction in RPM and/or a rise in EGT, but it should be minor (10-20 rpm, 20-50 deg EGT). This is due to the less-effcient burning of the mixture while operating on one set of plugs. The conclusion here is that the CHT didn't increase, so the timing of the secondary matches the timing of the primary. - Good-to-Go.
2) A notable reduction in CHT is observed, followed by a small loss of RPM and a decrease in EGT. If CHT goes DOWN with the secondary off, that's a sure-bet that the secondary timing is too advanced. The secondary is firing first and the engine is making more power as a result of the advanced timing situation. With more power comes more RPM, more heat (increased CHT) and more efficiency (lowered EGT). Advanced timing is a pretty good deal for power and efficiency, but it's dangerous because it places more stress on the engine and increases the chance of detonation at high-throttle (such as on takeoff on a hot day). There's a practical limit to timing advance, and the factory has found the "sweet-spot" over the years. Conclusion, retard the secondary timing slightly (1-2 degrees, if you can manage that fine of an adjustment), and test again.
3) The 3rd scenario is that the secondary timing is actually retarded, but you can't see that unless you re-fly the test and this time do a third piece where you get the baseline, then the secondary-off data, then the primary-off data. If the secondary is retarded you'll notice that the engine is making less power with the overall retarded timing, and the RPM will drop, CHT will drop, and EGT will increase.
The in-flight test is easy to perform, and can give you all the data you need to fine-tune the ignition timing top optimal performance. Give it a try and see for yourself how your engine behaves.
Jeff