vwglenn wrote:SvingenB wrote:I'd go with the aluminium case for an aircraft engine for a multitude if reasons
Why exactly? Magnesium has lots going for it.
Let me start by saying All of the VWs I've owned have had mag cases except the buggy I built. So I don't have much of a problem with running them in my cars and actually have a lot of faith in them.
My reasons...
An aluminum case can be easily welded.
Aluminum is stronger and has less tendency to warp especially in low RPM under load. The fore/aft load the prop puts significant stress on the bearing saddles where stronger aluminum would be better in my opinion. The engine was designed to primarily handle the rotational forces which is good for spinning a trany but probably not so much for hauling around 1000lbs of plane and pilot under various G loads.
While Ferdinand designed one hell of an engine, it was running about 36hp, about 45% less displacement, and a smaller stroke than we're putting in these planes. Plus he designed it when aluminum was scarce during the war (same reason the Spruce Goose was made of wood).
All the Type4s (1700-2000cc) went to aluminum for a reason (bigger engines pushing heavier cars).
VW has stopped making mag cases. http://www.hotvws.com/news2.php?contentID=74
And finally...Have you ever seen a mag case burn? That's not something I want to even be in the back of my head while I fly through the air.
So, while a mag case is probably just fine, I have my reasons for preferring aluminum in an aircraft application.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests