Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Discussion topics to include safety related issues and flight training.

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby fastj22 » Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:54 am


John Gillis
SEL Private, Comm Glider, Tow pilot (Pawnee Driver)
Waiex N116YX, Jabiru 3300, Tail dragger,
First flight, 3/16/2013. 403 hours and climbing.
Home: CO15. KOSH x 5
Flying a B-Model Conversion (Super Bee Baby!)
User avatar
fastj22
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:56 pm
Location: Mile High

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby samiam » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:22 am

Sounds like what most of us expected to hear. Unexplained loss of power on climb out with subsequent stall/spin. It's too bad they never did determine the reason for the engine failure.

We certainly do see that as years in aviation go by, that it's the same old problems that end up haunting pilots - even experienced ones. It's such a shame that we lost such a great member of the flying community.
Mike L
Sonex #1345
Tail complete
Working on wings
samiam
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 7:24 am
Location: S37

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby lpaaruule » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:32 am

Sure is disappointing that the cause wasn't determined. The report makes me wonder if the turbo would make white smoke seconds before it seized due to the extreme heat of friction. If not from that, then I wonder if the turbo stopping would make the mixture go extremely rich due to lack of air. Leaning would have been the right thing to do in that case.

The report indicated that someone else had flown with the turbo, and a partial seizure wouldn't allow the plane to climb. With two passengers and a total seize, I wouldn't think it would even maintain straight and level - based on the official report.

Really sad.
Last edited by lpaaruule on Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Paul LaRue
Sonex N454EE Plans# 1509
Jabiru 3300
First Flight 12/21/2017
http://www.mykitlog.com/lpaaruule
User avatar
lpaaruule
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:33 pm
Location: SE Michigan

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby fastj22 » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:52 am

The takeoff roll of 1700ft has me thinking there was a problem from the start. With the prop being more pitched for the turbo, if it didn't spin up, you wouldn't have the RPMs necessary for a climb out. The MGL could have been recording the RPMs and airspeed, but the report didn't mention any engine metrics harvested from it. I have mine set to constantly record every flight and just overwrite old entries. It does appear everyone involved did a thorough investigation and we just don't know.

John Gillis
SEL Private, Comm Glider, Tow pilot (Pawnee Driver)
Waiex N116YX, Jabiru 3300, Tail dragger,
First flight, 3/16/2013. 403 hours and climbing.
Home: CO15. KOSH x 5
Flying a B-Model Conversion (Super Bee Baby!)
User avatar
fastj22
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:56 pm
Location: Mile High

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby vwglenn » Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:43 pm

1700 foot roll out bugs the hell out of me too. I'm not sure I trust that data. I would be in total panic mode if my wheels were still on the ground after 1700 ft but I have a 3300. I would think ht turbo falls somewhere between mine and the 80 hp. 1700 is more than double the Sonex published takeoff roll for the standard Aerovee. I realize that there were two guys in the plane but it still seems excessive.
Glenn
Sonex #600
N889AP
vwglenn
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:00 am
Location: 6A2 - South of ATL

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby rizzz » Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:37 pm

To me, this is the statement that we should all take lessons from:
Calculations showed that, had the pilot used the entire runway for takeoff,
sufficient runway for a landing following the loss of engine power would likely have been
available.

No matter how rushed/keen you are to get airborne, if you have the runway available, use it! This might just be the one where you actually need it!
Michael
Sonex #145 from scratch (mostly)
Taildragger, 2.4L VW engine, AeroInjector, Prince 54x48 P-Tip
VH-MND, CofA issued 2nd of November 2015
First flight 7th of November 2015
Phase I Completed, 11th of February 2016
http://www.mykitlog.com/rizzz/
rizzz
 
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:07 am
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby Sonerai13 » Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:08 pm

rizzz wrote:To me, this is the statement that we should all take lessons from:
Calculations showed that, had the pilot used the entire runway for takeoff,
sufficient runway for a landing following the loss of engine power would likely have been
available.

No matter how rushed/keen you are to get airborne, if you have the runway available, use it! This might just be the one where you actually need it!


BINGO! This, more than anything else, is the lesson we should all take away from this very unfortunate accident. There is NO reason to leave runway behind you. Believe it!!
Joe Norris
Sonex N208GD (S/N 450)
Sonerai II N13NN (S/N 1206)
Fortes Fortuna Adiuvat
User avatar
Sonerai13
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: Oshkosh, WI

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby sonex1374 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:56 am

Joe,

I agree that extra runway is nice insurance, especially when it's available and cheap (the price of a few minutes taxi). However, I get worried when people start parroting this sentiment without really thinking about it. Each decision, including the decision to operate at the extreme of your envelope, should be carefully considered. You need to determine whether the operation is possible, and then think through the risks associated with doing it. If you do this honestly and deliberately you'll consider ways to mitigate, and then be ready to handle any remaining risk.

I think the thought process that should have happened here (maybe it did?) was to consider the risk of an intersection takeoff (including getting less performance than you anticipate), consider ways to mitigate (full length? changes to technique?), think through the residual risk (including emergency options and outs), then make a go/no decision (including a plan of action). This is no different than a glider pilot talking through a rope break (power failure!) from the takeoff roll (land straight ahead) to a break below 200 ft ( turn slightly, but don't stall!) to above 200 ft (turn back). You brief it every time so you force yourself to think it through all over again.

My point is that we should strive towards risk-informed decision making, and not simply risk avoidance.

Jeff
Jeff Shultz
Sonex TD, 3300, AeroInjector
Kansas City, MO
http://www.sonex604.com
sonex1374
 
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:02 am

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby vwglenn » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:09 am

Two other reinforcements...

1) FLY THE PLANE! Fly it into a tree. Fly it into a building. Fly it into a parked car. Fly it into the side of a mountain. None will feel good but you're much more likely to survive if you're in control of the aircraft when it makes contact with an object. Just make sure you don't panic and spin it in.

2) The impossible turn is bad juju! It must be a horrible instinct to overcome and way to many pilots far better than me seem to have tried and failed. Take some time to set up a safe test of the turn. It'll help reinforce why it's a bad idea, set a personal limit, and (hopefully) help you fight the urge to turn back to the runway.
Glenn
Sonex #600
N889AP
vwglenn
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:00 am
Location: 6A2 - South of ATL

Re: Has a NTSB Final been issued for N123SX?

Postby jerryhain » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:26 am

I doubt he had a 1700 foot take off roll, more likely came off the ground and held it down to the end of the runway and then started pop up there.
Jerry Hain, Tucson AZ
Waiex Electric?
CFI Glider/Airplane/Helicopter A&P
User avatar
jerryhain
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 1:12 pm
Location: Sahuarita, AZ

PreviousNext

Return to Safety and Training

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests