This line is pretty funny:
We respectfully request the Board to publicly convey that general aviation is one of the safest modes of transportation in the United States.
Would we be happy if the NTSB came back and said, alright... GA is safer than riding a bicycle on a city street? Maybe the numbers will work out in our favor and we're safer than motorcycles. Maybe depending on whether you consider hours or miles we won't look so bad. What we don't want the NTSB to do is actually make the list and show exactly how far down that list "one of the safest" really is.
Maybe the NTSB will come back and remind us EAB builders that our fatality rate is 3-6 times worse than the overall GA hourly fatality rate (The 2013 Nall report lists 3.37:100,000, down from 5.7:100,000 in 2012 for Amateur-Built and ELSA). The rest of GA probably wishes our statistics weren't included--they might look much better against motorcycles without us.
I'd be pleasantly surprised if the entire Sonex fleet has 100,000 total hours (500 aircraft with an average of 200 hours). We might be even worse than the EAB average.
The reality seems to be that it is safer than the general public realizes, but more dangerous than we like to admit. I feel like this letter to the NTSB will likely be ignored at best or draw more unwanted attention to ourselves at worst.