Bryan Cotton wrote:In light of the current troubles over at Vans, I think a slow rollout is not a bad thing.
BobDz wrote:Bryan Cotton wrote:In light of the current troubles over at Vans, I think a slow rollout is not a bad thing.
Ditto
dboeshaar wrote:
But the grief at Van's is really not directly related to development. Bad primer, bad laser holes and supply chain grief is the trifecta of this disaster.
Sonex does not have this grief, right?
Dkb
Scott Todd wrote:A typical Sonex weighs about 650 pounds. That leaves 500 for useful load. 16 gallons of fuel is 3 hours and around 400 miles for the Little JAB or AeroVee. This leave 400 for people. These are comparable to a Cessna 150. Slimming down to 2 hours range and 250 miles yields another 50 pounds for 'Well Conditioned' people. This seems more 'normal' than 'marginal'.
I think the High Wing will exceed these numbers which should make it quite competitive in the market.
Skippydiesel wrote:
Your Sonex empty weight is aspirational, once you go past a very basic Aerovee powered Sonex.
My Sonex Legacy/Rotax 912ULS/Airmaster CS/wing tanks (100L) - tops the scales at 340kg (750lb) - result! it's basically a single seater. Increasing the MTW (non aerobatic) to 600kg would change this.
peterp wrote:Bryan,
I don't think it's the engine, the Rotax power legacy I built was 295 kgs or 650 lbs
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests