by sonex1374 » Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:19 pm
All,
Loren and I have continued discussing the RPM signal issue offline, and I wanted to update the group. It's hard to say for sure what might be happening as there are other variables we might not have initially accounted for. First off, the internal design of AeroVee voltage regulators may have changed over the past few years, and secondly some RPM instruments may be better at picking up RPM signals from the AC lines than others. AeroVee regulators I am familiar with from the 2006-2010 timeframe had an internal construction such that one AC-in terminal (e.g. one of the outside terminals, not the center +Volts output terminal) would not output an RPM signal like the other one would. I encountered this problem, as did others. Kerry at the factory used to routinely recommend switching terminals if the RPM was reading zero. However, regulators may have changed, and it's certainly possible that a different gauge (better or more sophisticated gauge?) may pick up the alternator pulses regardless and work.
Loren has experience with his Dynon working on both terminals of the regulator (he tested them both), so there's some evidence that either regulators have changed or his Dynon works fine. In either case, it's a simple fix to try if the RPM isn't reading properly (swap terminals). If swapping doesn't work, then there may be a problem elsewhere (e.g. setting the correct number of pulses).
I'll also mention that many EMS/EFIS systems require a resistor in the rpm-sense line to condition the signal to something that the instrument can read properly. Depending on your instrument, you may or may not need it, and the values are all different among manufactures. I use a 10k ohm resistor in my Skyview to "smooth out the bumps" in the signal at high rpm.
Jeff