PFH Sonex B

Discussion for builders, pilots, owners, and those interested in building or owning a second generation Sonex or Waiex.

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby Zack » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:39 pm

pfhoeycfi wrote:I was experiencing very high CHTs, especially on #3, with my Turbo Aerovee since the warm WX arrived. This high (p) side is what it is so I made the low side lower...see pic. The improvement far exceeded my expectations. That is a 30 deg angle, 3/4" high, closed ends. CHTs are all in line now and the temps are lower. The oil cooler performance has improved as well. I'll do more testing but so far so good...

peter


What did you use between you wings and fuselage skins?
Zack
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 11:45 am

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby pfhoeycfi » Sat Sep 02, 2023 9:07 pm

That is RV wing root seal from Van's Aircraft.
Peter
Peter Hoey
SEL Pvt, Comm Glider, CFIG, Pawnee & L19 Towpilot
Philadelphia Glider Council
Sonex B SNB0021, N561PH, Taildragger, Aerovee Turbo, MGL MX1, First flight Dec 18, 2022
Also built Sonerai IIL N86PH
pfhoeycfi
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby karmarepair » Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:47 am

pfhoeycfi wrote:EAA test card 17 has one trim the airplane at 3 different speeds and push the nose over and increase the speed to plus 20, let go of the stick and count the number of oscillations to return to the trimmed speed. I can trim to any speed, but the plane does not want to return to the trimmed speed per the test. Has anyone else seen this in testing? Is this just the way the Sonex behaves?

Peter

It looks like you are within the "trim speed band". Ed Kolano has a series of articles on the EAA web site that talk about stability.
http://www.eaa.org/eaa/aircraft-buildin ... -technique
http://www.eaa.org/eaa/aircraft-buildin ... s-she-goes

These will require login
https://www.eaa.org/eaa/news-and-public ... ST%20PILOT
https://www.eaa.org/eaa/news-and-public ... ,-Friction
karmarepair
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 8:13 pm

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby kmacht » Sun Sep 03, 2023 6:15 pm

pfhoeycfi wrote:EAA test card 17 has one trim the airplane at 3 different speeds and push the nose over and increase the speed to plus 20, let go of the stick and count the number of oscillations to return to the trimmed speed. I can trim to any speed, but the plane does not want to return to the trimmed speed per the test. Has anyone else seen this in testing? Is this just the way the Sonex behaves?

Peter


That test only works on airplanes with positive stability. The sonex has neutral stability. Whatever attitude you out it in it stays there. That is why it is such a bad IFR platform but a fun aerobatic one. What you experienced is completely normal in a sonex. Although you didn’t meet the stated test requirement objective on the card you still learned something about the flight characteristics of your airplane and that’s the whole point of doing the testing in the first place.
kmacht
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:30 am

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby DCASonex » Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:14 am

Sonex are designed for neutral stability, like fighter planes. My conventional tail A series Sonex does the same.

While it no doubt upsets John - (prolonged straight and level flight is strictly prohibited) - Monnett, a dual axis autopilot is a great assist if using the plane to go cross country.

David A.
DCASonex
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: Western NY USA

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby pfhoeycfi » Fri Oct 27, 2023 9:13 am

I'm frustrated with the gear shimmy. My setup is B model, tw and 5x5 tires on the standard Sonex wheels for the mains. My Sonex never had the smaller tires installed. I had widened the sonex wheel pants to fit the 5x5s. Not long ago, the axle assembly tab broke and the right side brake and wheel pant rotated forward and the pant was ruined. At this point I put collars on the axle assemblies to beef up the the gear leg bolt holes and that got rid of the shimmy. I purchased new T18 style wheel pants from spruce to fit the 5x5s rather than buy new sonex pants which I would have had to modify again to fit the 5x5s (alot of work). Anyway, the new wheel pants fit great. The mounting is very rigid. I have plenty of clearance between the pants and the tire. I installed new bearings and pucks while I was at it. However, with the new pants on, after landing, when I begin to slow down (not using brakes) a bad wobble sets in. A wobble here is more than a shimmy. I'm at a loss as to what is going on. My only though after all the work I've put in to the gear and wheel pants is that the mass of the 5x5 configuration with the larger wheel pant is too much for that length and diameter gear leg. One idea I suppose is to put the standard Sonex tires and pants. Any thoughts? Suggestions?

Peter
Peter Hoey
SEL Pvt, Comm Glider, CFIG, Pawnee & L19 Towpilot
Philadelphia Glider Council
Sonex B SNB0021, N561PH, Taildragger, Aerovee Turbo, MGL MX1, First flight Dec 18, 2022
Also built Sonerai IIL N86PH
pfhoeycfi
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: PFH Sonex B

Postby T41pilot » Tue Jul 23, 2024 2:11 pm

pfhoeycfi wrote:I was experiencing very high CHTs, especially on #3, with my Turbo Aerovee since the warm WX arrived. This high (p) side is what it is so I made the low side lower...see pic. The improvement far exceeded my expectations. That is a 30 deg angle, 3/4" high, closed ends. CHTs are all in line now and the temps are lower. The oil cooler performance has improved as well. I'll do more testing but so far so good...

peter

Do you happen to have a drawing of this part? I'm having a little trouble getting the dimensions of the closed ends just right.
Gregg Kaat
Sonex B #0014
T41pilot
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:57 pm
Location: Howard City, Michigan

Previous

Return to Sonex-B / Waiex-B

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests