tmobbs wrote:Hi Mike
No, what I have in mind is having the canopy extend maybe 1/4" on top of / outside the turtle deck, so there is no gap. The rear canopy bow would still be in front of the first former of the turtle deck. but it's curvature would be almost exactly the same size as the turtle deck curvature so the rear edge of the canopy would extend over/ outside the turtle deck, so there would be no gap at all.
You say you wouldn't try overlapping there, but why not?
Incidentally, I quite expect there to be some rain penetration at the interface of the canopy and the windscreen, but at least there is the windshield strap providing some continuity between the canopy and the screen. What I was aiming for was a similar effect at the back.
Hello, again:
I knew what you meant, I just didn't do a good job of explaining myself :-) The point is the same. I think you will end up with something that fits well one hour, and through expansion or contraction not so well the next hour. Is your fuselage painted or polished? If painted, any contact by the canopy is going to wear away the paint quickly. If polished, it's going to get a rash from the canopy.
I'm not an aerodynamic engineer, but I think there is a drag effect from a blunt surface shedding air off the back side (the rear canopy edge in this case).
If you do decide to try it, I might suggest adding a gasket on the turtle deck former, extending up so it touches the canopy. Maybe that way the gasket will keep the canopy's shape and prevent it from contacting the turtle deck.
Just thinking out loud. I could be completely off base. It is "experimental" aviation after all ;)