Goodflight777 wrote:That can only be generated from a viable business. If the Viking engine fails from an excess of negative publicity crippling the business, the resources won't be there. Also, continued negative commentary creates a siege mentality, and will predictably make him less likely to have a generous turn of mind, if the Viking engine eventually becomes successful.
Goodflight777 wrote:The pure logic of the Jan situation is:
* No one has any chance of being paid back if Viking fails (since there will be no money to pay back).
* The constant negative online commentary increases the likelihood of Viking failure.
* Therefore the negative commentary reduces the chances of being paid back.
But the idea of an escrow account is a good one, for any high risk business for that matter.
Rynoth wrote: From what I've read (as a novice builder) of your first 4 posts on this forum, you sound like an advocate/employee of Viking that's trying to repair a reputation, but the statements you're making (generous turn of mind, chances of being paid back...) are really raising the eyebrows of myself, and I imagine any others who are new to this... scenario.
fastj22 wrote:Using the same logic, if Bernie Madoff were released from jail and started a new investment company, everyone should invest with him so that he can use his proceeds to pay off the people he ripped off previously.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests