Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Discussion of the Aerovee kit engine.

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby Sonex1517 » Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:36 am

Noel

When I had my turbo installed, I had “extra” throttle available. Full throttle was well over 40” MP

Just FYI
Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Aero Estates (T25)
First flight 10/10/2015
325+ hours
Jabiru 3300 Gen 4
Prince P Tip
Taildragger
N1517S
User avatar
Sonex1517
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby Outlaw6 » Sun Aug 25, 2019 3:43 pm

Got turbo cooling installed and I'm only getting 37" MAP. Tightened all the intake connections, no change, read through this forum again and saw NWade said waste gate actuator screws in, not swivels. Sure enough my jamb nut was loose and it let tension off the waste gate. Didn't have time to test, but I hope that's it.
Waiex N176WS (Tri-Gear Aerovee Turbo)
User avatar
Outlaw6
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed May 16, 2018 9:51 am
Location: Cincinnati area

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby WannaFly » Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:50 am

YES WASTE GATE SPRING TOO WEAK. Lutrom said it first
I"m running the prince prop also so sonex said they could not help but when I said I was over 3000 rpm I got the green light. First flight was Jun 3 '19 maxed out at 33" MAP... Been flying for 25 hours when it occurred to me the waste gate is working! I was going to wire it shut but my dad suggested just adding pre-load. So I tightened the screw all the way up--got 1" per turn of screw!! Then had to add a bunch of washers to get the waste gate further off the mount maxed out at 37"...I asked Kerry about sending me a stiffer spring and he said I was on my own to experiment with it---So I ordered the 4.41 psi (.3 bar) spring that was supposed to be in it and it got me 35" wow what a difference! Like I siad i've been flying at 32-33" and just jealous watching Michael farly just add MAP at will... i"m going to do what G.Maralis said--add a booster spring on the outside...

oh....new problem I think my spark is fading out over 34" keep it under 33 and it runs smooth will put in new plugs and see if they can handle the boost.. As Tim the Tool Man Taylor says... 'MORE POWER!!!!"
Onex Turbo Aerovee first flight June 3 2019!!
RV6 in progress
Rans S14
Vector 627
100 hours 172
last flew 9/28/2000
WannaFly
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:31 am

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby wlarson861 » Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:17 am

These are all symptoms of the piston bearing failing. The aerovee turbo needs cooling to keep it producing power. I was an early adapter and got lower power within a few hours of flying the turbo, The factory rebuilt my turbo but it was only a couple of hours before the turbo sized again . I have changed to a Jabiru and am very happy with the upgrade. Had I known then what I know now I could have saved 11000 bucks. Once the turbo puts out less than 40 map it is doomed to fail at some point. I would say that if you have the turbo and don't have the cooling packaging you are doomed from the start.
Bill Larson
N861SX
Sonex, polished, tail wheel, Generation 4 Jabiru 3300
wlarson861
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby Spaceman » Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:53 pm

Hey Noel did you ever figure out the definitive solution to your issue? I am tuning my aeroinjector and just did the first full throttle run; I was mostly paying attention to RPM vs Mixture vs EGTs, but I noticed pretty much the same performance that you had when you started this thread. At full throttle the most I got was about 3160 RPM, and 33-34" manifold pressure.

I haven't done anything to troubleshoot yet, since I was focusing on mixture stuff so I didn't really think about the RPM and manifold pressure until I got home and looked at the data. I guess I'll start with adding some preload to the wastegate actuator, and if that doesn't do anything maybe replace the spring?

Also, for what it's worth, I have a temporary 54x48 Sterba prop installed for now while I wait for the P-Tip I ordered, so I didn't expect the exact correct parameters, but I was surprised to get nowhere near 40" manifold pressure!
Chris Paegelow
N21YX / Waiex-B #21 / Roseville, CA
http://paegelow.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Spaceman
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:52 pm
Location: Roseville, CA

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby NWade » Tue Oct 12, 2021 12:04 pm

Spaceman wrote:Hey Noel did you ever figure out the definitive solution to your issue?


Yes, the definitive solution to my issue was that the White spring in the wastegate actuator was too weak - see my post earlier in this thread from late Oct 2018. Switching to a blue spring (per this image/chart) gave me an extra ~5 inches of boost at full WOT. Since that is about 2" more boost than spec, my solution is going to be to limit throttle travel at low elevations. With the white spring I could slightly change the max boost by adding pre-load to the actuator; but in the end the blue spring with no preload was the only way I could achieve the 40" MAP called out in the manual.

If you look at the spring chart I linked to above, the white spring is rated for 0.3 bar (and will start actuating at slightly less pressure). This is equivalent to ~8" - 9" of mercury. Add that to sea level pressure on a standard day (29.92) and you get ~38". Which is close to what I was seeing. The blue spring is rated for 0.5 bar (and again, starts actuating slightly below that), which is equivalent to ~11" - 14.7" of mercury. This would put max boost between 41" & 45" at sea level on a standard day - this is beyond what Sonex/Aeroconversions specifies, so I would urge caution to anyone who follows in my footsteps. I think that for many AeroVee Turbos, some preload and/or frictions in the system cause the effective spring rate of the wastegate to be just a touch higher than what is spec'ed for these springs; thus many folks can achieve 40" MAP right out of the box. But variance in setup and the exact spring strength (i.e. unit to unit variance) may leave a few folks 1-3" short.

NOTE: Your situation, being 6" short of the magic 40-inch number, may have a different root cause. First, using a temporary/different prop may not give you the same results. Second, I would urge you not to assume the wastegate actuator is the issue unless you've done testing and eliminated other potential causes (such as induction leaks, exhaust manifold leaks, throttle-travel limits, assembly errors in the wastegate actuator system, and instrumentation errors). If you can record engine data with your EFIS/EMS, warm up the engine for a minute or two and then slowly sweep the throttle up to full over ~5 seconds, and then smoothly pull it back down. Pay attention as you advance the throttle - do the MAP and RPM stop rising before you hit the throttle stop? After engine shutdown, grab the engine data and look at a graph of the MAP. If you see it plateau or have a small drop before the engine RPM starts to decline, that may be an indication the wastegate is opening too soon.

Best of luck,

--Noel
Sonex #1339
(stuck in sanding & painting hell) :-D
NWade
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby pfhoeycfi » Tue Oct 12, 2021 8:50 pm

Do you have a part # and source for the blue spring?
Peter Hoey
SEL Pvt, Comm Glider, CFIG, Pawnee & L19 Towpilot
Philadelphia Glider Council
Sonex B SNB0021, N561PH, Taildragger, Aerovee Turbo, MGL MX1, First flight Dec 18, 2022
Also built Sonerai IIL N86PH
pfhoeycfi
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 3:45 pm

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby NWade » Wed Oct 13, 2021 2:10 am

Peter -

I bought my blue spring on Amazon.com in late 2018, but the link is no longer good. A similar listing on Amazon has a bad review stating they didn’t get the pictured part so I’m hesitant to recommend that link/listing.

If you Google the part number shown in the chart that I posted, you can find the exact spring for sale directly from Kinugawa (the manufacturer of the wastegate actuator that came with my
AeroVee Turbo): http://shopping.kinugawaturbo.com/kinugawaadjustableturbowastegateactuatorspring441psi03bar-1.aspx

Note that the Kinugawa units come in different styles, with two different types of spring - the straight spring (which I linked above) has an actuator that can be adjusted via preload on the wastegate arm. They also sell a more-adjustable wastegate actuator that uses conical springs. I have no idea if Sonex has changed the parts they source/use for the wastegate system over time, so double check the actuator & spring style you have before ordering one of these blue springs.

Enjoy,

—Noel
NWade
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Turbo - Static MAP vs. in-flight MAP?

Postby Spaceman » Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:45 am

Thanks for the info Noel!

Yeah, understood I intentionally have the wrong prop on so I have to take everything with a grain of salt here. I'm just trying to get everything as close as I can to correct so hopefully when my prop shows up I'll just need some final tweaks.

Is there a good way to test for intake leaks? I looked everything over and didn't see any signs of exhaust leakage, which I think would be pretty visible. Intake seems trickier... I've done it on cars by spraying starting fluid on connections and listening for the RPMs to change momentarily, but that's a little easier without a spinning prop nearby! Plus I'm almost always working by myself.

Anyway I will check as best I can for intake and exhaust leakage, and then look at the wastegate actuator. I remember setting up the arm with no preload according to the aerovee manual (page 46). However on the Kinugawa website they recommend starting with 3 turns worth of preload. I'll try that and see if it helps.

The springs are on Amazon if you search for "Kinugawa spring." I saw the bad reviews but I ordered a 0.3 and 0.5 bar spring anyway just in case I want to experiment later. I'll start with the pushrod adjustment first though!!

I also don't want to do too many of these high power ground runs though, the engine seems to really heat up in a hurry which I don't enjoy watching. I just want to get it close enough to fly, then do some breaking in, then perfect it later. My home runway is 7200' long at 1800 MSL, so I'm not super worried about slightly less than 100% takeoff performance initially.
Chris Paegelow
N21YX / Waiex-B #21 / Roseville, CA
http://paegelow.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Spaceman
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:52 pm
Location: Roseville, CA

Previous

Return to Aerovee

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests