Fuel level sender

Discussion for Sonex builders on specific plans page experience. These posts are limited to technical suggestions such as assembly order, challenges, or techniques related to specific plans pages.

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby DCASonex » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:14 am

I have the Princeton (Now R.E.D.) capacitive probe and a red cube fuel flow sender in my A series with a CAMit 3300 and a GRT Sport SX. . Both the actual and calculated fuel levels are very close together at all the way to the end. The capacitive probe is not accurate if you use multiple grades of avgas/mogas. But have no info on how the capacitive sensors may work in metal tanks.

David A.
DCASonex
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: Western NY USA

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby pappas » Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:47 pm

If the calibration process was done exactly per instructions, the levels were very accurate and I never had cause to second guess them. Of course, I always cross-checked them with the calibrated fuel flow readings at every fill-up.
Lou Pappas
Phoenix, AZ
RV-7A (Building)
Waiex B Turbo
RV-8
Waiex Legacy 3300
Hiperlight SNS-9
Falcon Ultralight[/b]
pappas
 
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:27 am

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby Skippydiesel » Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:50 pm

bvolcko38 wrote:I have an MGL efis with sonex supplied probe. I calibrated with 100ll. Using 90 or 91 non ethanol, my fuel gauge reads about 2 gallons low.


Better low (pessimistic) than high (optimistic) but 2 Gall ( 7.6L) seems a tad inaccurate for our small aircraft/fuel tanks.

I am sure you would have done a recalibration with no improvement - could this be a MGL issue rather than a sensor problem?
Last edited by Skippydiesel on Fri Aug 11, 2023 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby bvolcko38 » Fri Aug 11, 2023 8:33 am

I think its an electro-chemical issue. 100ll has different properties from 90 non ethanol. I could re calibrate with non ethanol.
Bill Volcko XNS0068
Xenos A N68WV 99% flush rivets
Aerovee and Prince P-Tip
MGL Discovery Lite w/ Sandia STX 165R
V6
First hole 4/1/16
First flight 8/24/18
Phase I complete...finally!!!
Also flying a Challenger II since 1999
User avatar
bvolcko38
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 7:40 am

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby sonex892. » Fri Aug 11, 2023 5:51 pm

Skip. Australian fuels may have more similar dielectric properties. I have been using both Avgas and 98 octane (90% 98 octane) with this probe for 13 years now. Have never seen difference in level readings when alternating or mixing fuels. I use a calibrated dipstck to confirm fuel level preflight.
Steve
Lazair kit 1981 sold
Sonerai 2LS plansbuilt 2003 sold
Sonex kit 2010
Sonerai 2LS project rotax 912
User avatar
sonex892.
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:32 am

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby Skippydiesel » Fri Aug 11, 2023 7:46 pm

bvolcko38 wrote:I think its an electro-chemical issue. 100ll has different properties from 90 non ethanol. I could re calibrate with non ethanol.


Now I understand - the small inaccuracy may be due to differing fuels. - Thanks.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Fuel level sender

Postby Skippydiesel » Fri Aug 11, 2023 7:50 pm

sonex892. wrote:Skip. Australian fuels may have more similar dielectric properties. I have been using both Avgas and 98 octane (90% 98 octane) with this probe for 13 years now. Have never seen difference in level readings when alternating or mixing fuels. I use a calibrated dipstck to confirm fuel level preflight.


Thanks for that - Sounds to me that the RED/Princeton probe is a reliable & consistent fuel sensor -just what I need to help with in flight fuel management.

Like you, I would never take flight without a physical (calibrated dipstick) check on fuel quantity.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Previous

Return to Sonex Plans

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests