Scott Todd wrote:I would be interested in finding a good reason to NOT use the automotive variants instead of whatever everyone else is doing. Millions of cars driving all over the planet for the last 100 years can't be completely wrong.
To be blunt - automotive fluids, hardware, equipment, etc. are simply not necessarily applicable to aircraft. For example, aircraft brakes use different seals, O-Rings and hose materials than automobiles and these materials are not compatible with automotive brake fluid. Tolerance of high temperatures may also be a concern, do you have the education, experience and knowledge to determine that?
Other examples include wiring, aircraft wire is different than automotive and other wire because the insulation material does not produce toxic fumes during an electrical fire, and only aircraft wire should be installed on an airplane. Only aircraft hardware (nuts, bolts, etc.) should be installed on an airplane, no hardware store hardware. Aircraft hardware has specific corrosion, shear, tension strength and so on as called for, and and using the correct AN and/or MS designation insures the hardware is suitable for the application on an aircraft.
Being further blunt, if you have the attitude you do not want to use aircraft quality materials, including the correct materials specified for the components to be installed on your airplane, you should not be constructing an airplane. You need the attitude that your airplane will be as good as it can be, as correct and as airworthy as it can be, which it can only be if specified and aircraft quality materials are used. If you want to be creative and go off the beaten path, do it with non-airworthy related items such as cockpit vents, paint scheme, avionics installation, things that do not affect the structural integrity and operational reliability of the airplane.