MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Discussion of Avionics and Flight Instruments. Such as: EFIS, EIS, GPS, COM, NAV, Antennas, Audio Panels, Steam Gauges

Re: MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Postby badaero » Thu Sep 30, 2021 4:59 pm

My MGL Extreme tach is flaky as well. My builder used a tiny tach too. Tachs match most of the time.
Bruce Drinnen
M'boro,TN
720SX
"Money can't buy happiness but it can buy airplanes and bacon!"
badaero
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2019 6:39 pm

Re: MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Postby sonex892. » Thu Sep 30, 2021 6:50 pm

Hi Mark
This may only relevant if you have the RDAC XF. With your pickup from the P lead definitely use the 10k ohm resistor. With the DIP switch positions try, Noise ON , Ballast OFF, Gain OFF. You should be able to fine tune to a steady reading from that using the sensitivity pot screw. The only settings in the display should be pulses per revolution, max/min RPM and alarms. The disadvantage of using the P lead is you either need 2 RPM displays or live with losing the tacho when the mag switch is turned off.
Steve
Sonex 892
Steve
Lazair kit 1981 sold
Sonerai 2LS plansbuilt 2003 sold
Sonex kit 2010
Sonerai 2LS project rotax 912
User avatar
sonex892.
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:32 am

Re: MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Postby MichaelFarley56 » Wed Nov 17, 2021 8:38 pm

Hello Everyone,

My apologies for digging up an old thread, but I continue to have issues getting a reliable tach reading from my Jabiru 3300 and MGL XF RDAC. I’ve talked to Michigan Avionics and Jabiru USA and get the same answer…good luck!

Ultimately it seems like there are 3 ways to get a tach reading: - a feed off an alternator output, a feed off a coil P-lead, or a Hall Effect Device. Everyone tends to agree the alternator output offers the highest chance of success but there has been no guarantee of anything working.

For me personally, it appears the alternator output feed has given me the best results but I still have an RPM range (1600-2300 rpm) where the system simply won’t read. For those with the same setup, I’m curious if anyone has done a resistor or diode of some type to make the signal more readable.

I’m not good at the electronics stuff but I’m more than willing to try and add or modify the sensor lead to get a more reliable signal. Has anyone found good luck with a resistor or something similar?

Thanks everyone!
Mike Farley
Waiex #0056 - N569KM
Jabiru 3300A #1706
MGL Panel
MichaelFarley56
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:38 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Postby T41pilot » Thu Nov 18, 2021 9:04 am

My Grand Rapids Technology manual suggests another option to try. They show a method to use a pick off point off of the trigger side of an ignition coil. It's old school but might work. I currently am using the p-lead method on my Aerovee and have a stable reading using a 27K resistor. Down side is I lose the tack reading on mag check and have to compare RPM drop by ear. I probably at some point in the future will change to a hall effect solution if I can find a sensor that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
Attachments
Screenshot 2021-11-18 at 07-49-29 Remote-EIS-Install-and-User-Manual-A pdf.png
Gregg Kaat
Sonex B #0014
T41pilot
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:57 pm
Location: Howard City, Michigan

Re: MGL RDAC RPM connection to Jabiru 3300

Postby MichaelFarley56 » Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:07 am

Interesting. Okay thank you. I had a 10K resistor in there but that makes it seem like it’s still a dirty signal so maybe I’ll try that as well. Use a bigger resistor and see if that cleans up the signal a little.

Thanks for the thought!
Mike Farley
Waiex #0056 - N569KM
Jabiru 3300A #1706
MGL Panel
MichaelFarley56
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:38 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Previous

Return to Avionics and Instruments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests